Things to consider

For whatever reason, the history of women and psychiatry has popped up several times in the past few weeks for me. I’ve seen two separate art exhibits revolving around the theme, and then there is the new season of American Horror Story. I’ve read some commentary from folks who feel like the show shoves a feminist agenda down the throats of its viewers. Personally, I think it’s those very issues that make the show interesting. Were it not for the underlying message, the show would be flat out weird and disturbing.

Anyway, the first two episodes of AHS: Asylum reminded me of a story my mother told me when I was a teenager. When she was a teenager herself, a family member was in a bad marriage. The husband stayed out all hours, catted about and spent money while leaving the wife home with the kids, it was basically a typical if terrible dysfunctional relationship. Keep in mind that this would have been in the late 50s/early 60s, and divorce was not common. When he would finally come home, the wife would of course be enraged. His response was to threaten her by saying that, in a nutshell, she had better suck it up and deal with it, or he would have her committed.

I remember being utterly confused by this, and my mom’s explanation was something along the lines of, “Oh yeah, they could still do that back then. A husband could commit his wife for all kinds of reasons.”

Teenage me was in disbelief. I think it was the first time I ever thought about women’s rights. A little research told me that, yes, women could be institutionalized by their husbands, for being promiscuous, or because they were gay. And I learned other things too, like the fact that it wasn’t until the 1970s that legislation was passed that made it easier for women to obtain credit in their own name. It’s difficult to imagine that just a few years before I was born credit wasn’t readily available to women.

I think it’s easy to forget that the current state of modern Western woman is a relatively new thing. Let’s face it, in the grand scheme of human history, the widespread idea that women should be treated with fairness and equality is still pretty darned new. And yet we already fail to remember that women (and men, many of them fought hard for women’s rights) had to fight for things like the right to vote, or not to be discriminated against in the workplace (which sadly still happens all too often). This is a big part of why I find it frustrating when women don’t care about voting. For crying out loud, in America we haven’t even had the right to do so for a hundred years yet, so how can anyone be lackadaisical about it?

I think it’s worth noting that pretty much all of the above doesn’t only apply to women, but to minorities too. Going back to American Horror Story, if you’ve been watching this season then you know that it isn’t just women’s issues at the forefront of the show, race and disabilities are addressed as well. And individuals with disabilities are certainly yet another population of people for which the current standard is very new.

My grandmother is in her 80s, and still takes care of her eldest child, my aunt, who has Down’s syndrome. My aunt was born in 1950, at a time when it was quite common for people with Down’s, or any disability really, to be institutionalized. Despite pressure to place her child in a group home, my grandmother refused. And from what I understand, that pressure came from all sorts of people, including hospital staff. I can’t imagine having someone tell you to give up your brand new baby. Apparently, neither could she. My grandma went on to have five other children, each just a few years apart from the next. Six kids, one with special needs, and not a lot of money, makes for a tough job as a mom. That’s admirable, in my book.

I wasn’t sure where I was going with this post when I began, but I guess I’m saying that taking things for granted is a very good way to lose something.

That’s all. Now go forth and enjoy the weekend.

14 thoughts on “Things to consider

  1. “I’m saying that taking things for granted is a very good way to lose something.”
    I agree. That is why seeing so many women willingly and GLEEFULLY voting for people who have anything but their best interest at heart makes me physically ill sometimes. “It won’t get that bad” is something I just shake my head in wonder at. As you pointed out it WAS that bad not all that long ago.

    Just out of curiosity, was one of the exhibits you went to see Lezley Saar’s “Madwoman in The Attic”?

      • I wish! I am in FL and have had to content myself with the video previews and whatever she posts on Facebook; I do enjoy most of her work when I get to see it. In the interest of full disclosure, Lezley is actually a friend of mine (but if you didn’t care for the exhibit I swear I won’t unfollow).

  2. I feel like I need to be watching AHS. I watched the pilot right around when it started and didn’t get hooked but everything suggests the show should be one for me.

  3. When I (rarely) deal with haughty Europeans who sniff at the unenlightened nature of the United States, I like to use women’s suffrage and when women got the right to vote as an example:

    US – 1920
    Sweden – 1921
    Britain, Ireland – 1928
    Spain – 1931
    France – 1944
    Italy – 1945
    Switzerland – 1971
    Portugal – 1976

    Yeah, in parts of Europe, that bastion of enlightenment, women couldn’t vote as recently as 36 years ago. Plus, our women shower. :)

  4. Rule of thumb law, sexual molestation for hysteria, entire witchcraft trials, female circumsision, being a woman sure has sucked. We have to stay on our toes ( and not dress as slutty skunks for Halloween).

  5. Oh I could go on and on about my frustration with women who subjugate their decisions and choices to the men in their lives and who believe that there is a hierarchy between the sexes. I went to a very conservative Christian college and even 30 years later some of my friends and their world views are still stuck in that very limiting world.

    I have a cousin with Downs and she lived at home for a long time. She has other issues, being autistic among them that make it hard for her to live at home any longer, but she is happy and healthy in the group home she resides in now. But you are right. There was a lot of pressure to make a different decision 40 some years ago when she was born. We have come a long way as a society, but there is such a pervasive attitude that this progress is bad and we need to dial it back to Mayberry times in order for the world to be right and sane again, it is scary.

    • For some people being in a group home is the best option, and there are many, many wonderful organizations out there today that provide excellent living situations. In my aunt’s case, the state she resides in was notorious for having appalling facilities in the 50s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>